Men’s HeatGear® 3″ Short Boxerjock® Bottoms by Under Armour

Men’s HeatGear® 3″ Short Boxerjock® Bottoms by Under Armour

  • Under Armour Performance Underwear

UA’s signature Moisture Transport System and temperature regulation gave athlete’s something they’d never had before?a performance alternative to all the other underwear in their drawer. Forget your old underwear that bunches up, wears out, or loses its shape; UA’s O Series underwear stretches, recovers, and fits exactly how you want it to. Anti-Odor Technology prevents the growth of odor causing microbes. 3-inch inseam. 95% Polyester / 5% Elastane. Imported.It started with a simple plan to make a superior T-shirt. A shirt that provided compression and wicked perspiration off your skin rather than absorb it. A shirt that worked with your body to regulate temperature and enhance performance. Founded in 1996 by former University of Maryland football player Kevin Plank,

Under Armour is the originator of performance apparel – gear engineered to keep athletes cool, dry, and light throughout the course of a game, practice, or workout. The technology behind Under Armour’s diverse pro

List Price: $ 0.00

Price: $ 0.00

Found More:

3 thoughts on “Men’s HeatGear® 3″ Short Boxerjock® Bottoms by Under Armour

  1. 8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
    4.0 out of 5 stars
    Under Armour underwear, May 16, 2008
    By 
    Bill Bo Jeff “Bill” (Holland, Michigan) –

    Good product. I’m disappointed that they were so expensive ($20 each), but they do the job. I won’t order these again, as I found another brand that is half price and does the job just as well (Jockey brand, Go Mesh). I wore these Under Armours for my first 25k run (15.5 miles), and I never felt them, never got any chafing, and they were extremely, extremely comfortable. But at $20 each, they’re a little expensive. Additionally, the term “boxerjock” I believe to be a misnomer. I didn’t feel as if they were a true athletic supporter, but they supported me ok. No problems.

     

     


    |

     Comment

  2. 11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    Excellent product for athletics, December 16, 2007
    By 
    J. Matt Landrum (Starkville, MS USA) –
    (VINE VOICE)
      

    In general, I really like Under Armour products. These BoxerJock’s are no exception. I have two pairs and really like the comfort and the way they keep everything in place when you are running around.

    One word of caution – I am a 38 waist. According to the size charts I should buy a Large. XL was much more comfortable. Your mileage may vary according to your body shape (my sample size was only 2).

    These are DEFINITELY worth the money in my opinion – just a great product.

     

     


    |

     Comment (1)

  3. 20 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    Great, plain and simple, June 25, 2007
    By 
    Craig E. Poley “deionychus” (Colorado, USA) –
      

    I’m a cyclist and that means my thighs are bigger than normal. I’ve had a terrible time with regular cotton underwear chafing the beejeezus out of me. I’ve worn under armour now for about 2 years, and I will never own anything else again. If they stop making these I’ll have to wear cycling shorts for underwear because nothing else comes close.

    If you are an athlete and have had similar problems, buy these and you won’t be sorry.

     

     


    |

     Comments (2)

Leave a Reply